MarkWide Research

Sale!

Ultrasound Conductive Gels Market Analysis- Industry Size, Share, Research Report, Insights, Covid-19 Impact, Statistics, Trends, Growth and Forecast 2022-2030

Published Date: July, 2022
No of Pages: 153
Delivery Format: PDF + Excel

$2,950.00

The Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market is estimated at USD 258.6 million in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 459.2 million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 7.6% during the forecast period (2022-2030). The advancements in bio-related applications, specifically ultrasound technologies, require conductive gel platforms for engineering materials with good biocompatibility, varied functionalization and modifiable mechanical strength. Ultrasound conductivity gels have proven to be an ideal material for advanced applications with respect to bio-electronics and biosensors. This virtue has established a high drive in demand for ultrasound conductivity gels over the globe.

Increasing concern in terms of health related issues and the constant evolution in technology and medicine fields of research have thus initiated evaluation of a model gel based conductivity medium for use in ultrasound procedures. This is owed to the constructed property of ultrasound conductivity gels with tighter coupling and improved compatibility with soft and dynamically deformed biological surfaces or internal organs. This is a major factor which is responsible for reliable diagnostic and patient outcome, thus increasing the value of patient care.

Market Outlook:

Data PointsMarket Insights
Market Value 2021US$ 258.6 Mn
Market Value 2028US$ 459.2 Mn
CAGR 2022-20287.6%
Market Share of Top 5 Countries62.8%
Key PlayersMedline Industries Inc., Parker Laboratories, Inc., Roscoe Medical, Cardinal Health, Inc. , ECO-MED Diagnostic Imaging, National Therapy Products Inc., Modul Diagram S.r.l, Ceracarta Spa, DJO Global, Inc. and Pharmaceutical Innovation Inc.

Report Scope as per Ultrasound conductivity gels Industry Analysis

AttributeDetails
Forecast Period2022-2030
Historical Data Available for2017-2021
Market AnalysisUS$ Mn for Value
Key Regions CoveredNorth America, Latin America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, APECJ, China, Japan and Middle East and Africa
Key Countries CoveredUS, Canada,  Brazil,  Mexico, Germany, U.K., France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland, China, Japan, India, ASEAN, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and GCC Countries
Key Market Segments CoveredProduct Type, End User and Region
Key Companies Profiled
  • Medline Industries Inc.
  • Parker Laboratories, Inc.
  • Roscoe Medical
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • ECO-MED Diagnostic Imaging
  • National Therapy Products Inc.
  • Modul Diagram S.r.l
  • Ceracarta Spa
  • DJO Global, Inc.
  • Pharmaceutical Innovation Inc.
  • Others

Key Market Segments Covered:

By Product Type

  • Sterile Gels
  • Non Sterile Gels

By End User

  • Hospitals
  • Clinics
  • Diagnostic Centers
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers

By Region

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • Italy
    • France
    • UK
    • Spain
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • The Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Czech Republic
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Indonesia
    • Malaysia
    • Thailand
    • Singapore
    • Australia & New Zealand
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
    • Rest of South America
  • The Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • South Africa
    • Northern Africa
    • Rest of MEA

Table of content

1. Executive Summary

1.1. Market Overview

1.2. Market Analysis

1.3. FMI Analysis and Recommendations

1.4. Wheel of Fortune

2. Market Introduction

2.1. Market Taxonomy

2.2. Market Definition

3. Global Economic Outlook

3.1. Global Healthcare Market Outlook by Region

4. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Overview

4.1. Key Manufacturer List

4.2. Key Distributors List

4.3. Market Dynamics Impact Analysis

4.4. Comparative Analysis

4.5. Pricing Analysis

5. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market View Point Analysis

5.1. Macro-Economic Factors

5.2. Market Drivers

5.3. Market Restraints

5.4. Opportunity Analysis

5.5. Market Trends

6. North America Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Country, 2013–2021

6.2.1. U.S.

6.2.2. Canada

6.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2022-2028

6.3.1. U.S.

6.3.2. Canada

6.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

6.4.1. Sterile Gels

6.4.2. Non Sterile Gels

6.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

6.5.1. Sterile Gels

6.5.2. Non Sterile Gels

6.6. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

6.6.1. Hospitals

6.6.2. Clinics

6.6.3. Diagnostic Centers

6.6.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

6.7. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

6.7.1. Hospitals

6.7.2. Clinics

6.7.3. Diagnostic Centers

6.7.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

6.8. Market Attractiveness Analysis

6.8.1. By Country

6.8.2. By Product Type

6.8.3. By End User

6.9. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

6.10. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

6.11. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

7. Latin America Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Country, 2013–2021

7.2.1. Brazil

7.2.2. Mexico

7.2.3. Rest of Latin America

7.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2022-2028

7.3.1. Brazil

7.3.2. Mexico

7.3.3. Rest of Latin America

7.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

7.4.1. Sterile Gels

7.4.2. Non Sterile Gels

7.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

7.5.1. Sterile Gels

7.5.2. Non Sterile Gels

7.6. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

7.6.1. Hospitals

7.6.2. Clinics

7.6.3. Diagnostic Centers

7.6.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

7.7. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

7.7.1. Hospitals

7.7.2. Clinics

7.7.3. Diagnostic Centers

7.7.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

7.8. Market Attractiveness Analysis

7.8.1. By Country

7.8.2. By Product Type

7.8.3. By End User

7.9. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

7.10. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

7.11. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

8. Western Europe Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

8.1. Introduction

8.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Country, 2013–2021

8.2.1. United Kingdom

8.2.2. France

8.2.3. Germany

8.2.4. Italy

8.2.5. Spain

8.2.6. Rest of Western Europe

8.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2022-2028

8.3.1. United Kingdom

8.3.2. France

8.3.3. Germany

8.3.4. Italy

8.3.5. Spain

8.3.6. Rest of Western Europe

8.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

8.4.1. Sterile Gels

8.4.2. Non Sterile Gels

8.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

8.5.1. Sterile Gels

8.5.2. Non Sterile Gels

8.6. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

8.6.1. Hospitals

8.6.2. Clinics

8.6.3. Diagnostic Centers

8.6.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

8.7. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

8.7.1. Hospitals

8.7.2. Clinics

8.7.3. Diagnostic Centers

8.7.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

8.8. Market Attractiveness Analysis

8.8.1. By Country

8.8.2. By Product Type

8.8.3. By End User

8.9. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

8.10. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

8.11. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

9. Eastern Europe Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

9.1. Introduction

9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Country, 2013–2021

9.2.1. Russia

9.2.2. Poland

9.2.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

9.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2022-2028

9.3.1. Russia

9.3.2. Poland

9.3.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

9.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

9.4.1. Sterile Gels

9.4.2. Non Sterile Gels

9.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

9.5.1. Sterile Gels

9.5.2. Non Sterile Gels

9.6. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

9.6.1. Hospitals

9.6.2. Clinics

9.6.3. Diagnostic Centers

9.6.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

9.7. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

9.7.1. Hospitals

9.7.2. Clinics

9.7.3. Diagnostic Centers

9.7.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

9.8. Market Attractiveness Analysis

9.8.1. By Country

9.8.2. By Product Type

9.8.3. By End User

9.9. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

9.10. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

9.11. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

10. Asia Pacific Excluding China and Japan Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

10.1. Introduction

10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Country, 2013–2021

10.2.1. India

10.2.2. Australia and New Zealand

10.2.3. ASEAN

10.2.4. Rest of APECJ

10.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2022-2028

10.3.1. India

10.3.2. Australia and New Zealand

10.3.3. ASEAN

10.3.4. Rest of APECJ

10.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

10.4.1. Sterile Gels

10.4.2. Non Sterile Gels

10.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

10.5.1. Sterile Gels

10.5.2. Non Sterile Gels

10.6. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

10.6.1. Hospitals

10.6.2. Clinics

10.6.3. Diagnostic Centers

10.6.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

10.7. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

10.7.1. Hospitals

10.7.2. Clinics

10.7.3. Diagnostic Centers

10.7.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

10.8. Market Attractiveness Analysis

10.8.1. By Country

10.8.2. By Product Type

10.8.3. By End User

10.9. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

10.10. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

10.11. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

11. China Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

11.1. Introduction

11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

11.2.1. Sterile Gels

11.2.2. Non Sterile Gels

11.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

11.3.1. Sterile Gels

11.3.2. Non Sterile Gels

11.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

11.4.1. Hospitals

11.4.2. Clinics

11.4.3. Diagnostic Centers

11.4.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

11.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

11.5.1. Hospitals

11.5.2. Clinics

11.5.3. Diagnostic Centers

11.5.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

11.6. Market Attractiveness Analysis

11.6.1. By Product Type

11.6.2. By End User

11.7. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

11.8. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

11.9. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

12. Japan Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

12.1. Introduction

12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

12.2.1. Sterile Gels

12.2.2. Non Sterile Gels

12.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

12.3.1. Sterile Gels

12.3.2. Non Sterile Gels

12.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

12.4.1. Hospitals

12.4.2. Clinics

12.4.3. Diagnostic Centers

12.4.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

12.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

12.5.1. Hospitals

12.5.2. Clinics

12.5.3. Diagnostic Centers

12.5.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

12.6. Market Attractiveness Analysis

12.6.1. By Product Type

12.6.2. By End User

12.7. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

12.8. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

12.9. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

13. Middle East and Africa Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

13.1. Introduction

13.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Country, 2013–2021

13.2.1. GCC Countries

13.2.2. South Africa

13.2.3. Rest of Middle East and Africa

13.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Country, 2022-2028

13.3.1. GCC Countries

13.3.2. South Africa

13.3.3. Rest of Middle East and Africa

13.4. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

13.4.1. Sterile Gels

13.4.2. Non Sterile Gels

13.5. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

13.5.1. Sterile Gels

13.5.2. Non Sterile Gels

13.6. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End User, 2013–2021

13.6.1. Hospitals

13.6.2. Clinics

13.6.3. Diagnostic Centers

13.6.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

13.7. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

13.7.1. Hospitals

13.7.2. Clinics

13.7.3. Diagnostic Centers

13.7.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

13.8. Market Attractiveness Analysis

13.8.1. By Country

13.8.2. By Product Type

13.8.3. By End User

13.9. Drivers and Restraints: Impact Analysis

13.10. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Map)

13.11. Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Snapshot

14. Forecast Factors: Relevance and Impact

15. Forecast Assumptions

16. Competition Landscape

16.1. Competition Dashboard

16.2. Co Company Deep Dive

16.2.1. Medline Industries Inc.

16.2.1.1. Overview

16.2.1.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.1.3. Production Footprint

16.2.1.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.1.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.1.6. Strategy

16.2.1.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.1.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.1.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.2. Parker Laboratories, Inc.

16.2.2.1. Overview

16.2.2.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.2.3. Production Footprint

16.2.2.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.2.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.2.6. Strategy

16.2.2.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.2.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.2.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.3. Roscoe Medical

16.2.3.1. Overview

16.2.3.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.3.3. Production Footprint

16.2.3.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.3.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.3.6. Strategy

16.2.3.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.3.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.3.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.4. Cardinal Health, Inc.

16.2.4.1. Overview

16.2.4.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.4.3. Production Footprint

16.2.4.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.4.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.4.6. Strategy

16.2.4.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.4.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.4.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.5. Eco-Med Diagnostic Imaging

16.2.5.1. Overview

16.2.5.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.5.3. Production Footprint

16.2.5.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.5.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.5.6. Strategy

16.2.5.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.5.6..2. Product Strategy

16.2.5.6..3. Channel Strategy

16.2.6. National Therapy Products Inc.

16.2.6.1. Overview

16.2.6.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.6.3. Production Footprint

16.2.6.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.6.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.6.6. Strategy

16.2.6.6..1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.6.6..2. Product Strategy

16.2.6.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.7. Modul Diagram Srl

16.2.7.1. Overview

16.2.7.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.7.3. Production Footprint

16.2.7.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.7.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.7.6. Strategy

16.2.7.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.7.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.7.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.8. Ceracarta Spa

16.2.8.1. Overview

16.2.8.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.8.3. Production Footprint

16.2.8.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.8.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.8.6. Strategy

16.2.8.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.8.6..2. Product Strategy

16.2.8.6..3. Channel Strategy

16.2.9. DJO Global, Inc.

16.2.9.1. Overview

16.2.9.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.9.3. Production Footprint

16.2.9.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.9.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.9.6. Strategy

16.2.9.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.9.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.9.6.3. Channel Strategy

16.2.10. Pharmaceutical Innovation Inc.

16.2.10.1. Overview

16.2.10.2. Product and Age Group Portfolio

16.2.10.3. Production Footprint

16.2.10.4. Sales Footprint

16.2.10.5. Channel Footprint

16.2.10.6. Strategy

16.2.10.6.1. Marketing Strategy

16.2.10.6.2. Product Strategy

16.2.10.6.3. Channel Strategy

17. Global Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028 By Region

17.1. Introduction / Key Findings

17.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Region

17.2.1. North America

17.2.2. Latin America

17.2.3. Western Europe

17.2.4. Eastern Europe

17.2.5. Asia Pacific Excluding China and Japan

17.2.6. China

17.2.7. Japan

17.2.8. Middle East and Africa

17.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Region

17.3.1. North America

17.3.2. Latin America

17.3.3. Western Europe

17.3.4. Eastern Europe

17.3.5. Asia Pacific Excluding China and Japan

17.3.6. China

17.3.7. Japan

17.3.8. Middle East and Africa

17.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region

18. Global Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028, By Product Type

18.1. Introduction/Key Finding

18.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Product Type, 2013–2021

18.2.1. Sterile Gels

18.2.2. Non Sterile Gels

18.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Product Type, 2022-2028

18.3.1. Sterile Gels

18.3.2. Non Sterile Gels

18.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Product Type

19. Global Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028, By End User

19.1. Introduction/Key Finding

19.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By End User, 2013–2021

19.2.1. Hospitals

19.2.2. Clinics

19.2.3. Diagnostic Centers

19.2.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

19.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By End User, 2022-2028

19.3.1. Hospitals

19.3.2. Clinics

19.3.3. Diagnostic Centers

19.3.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers

19.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By End User

20. Global Ultrasound Conductivity Gels Market Analysis 2013–2021 and Forecast 2022–2028

20.1. Market Size and Y-o-Y Growth

20.2. Absolute $ Opportunity

21. Research Methodology

Segmentation

By Product Type

  • Sterile Gels
  • Non Sterile Gels

By End User

  • Hospitals
  • Clinics
  • Diagnostic Centers
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers

Companies

  • Medline Industries Inc.
  • Parker Laboratories, Inc.
  • Roscoe Medical
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • ECO-MED Diagnostic Imaging
  • National Therapy Products Inc.
  • Modul Diagram S.r.l
  • Ceracarta Spa
  • DJO Global, Inc.
  • Pharmaceutical Innovation Inc.
  • Others

Why Choose MWR

Quality Research

Our goal is to provide high-quality data that stimulates growth and creates a win-win situations

Unlimited User Access 

We offer Corporate User license access on all our reports in which you can share the report with your entire team without any restrictions

Free Company Inclusion 

We give you an option to include 3-4 additional company players of your choice in our report without any extra charges

Post Sale Assistance

Unlimited post sales service with an account manager dedicated to making sure that all your needs are met

Covid-19 Impact Analysis

All our research report includes latest Covid-19 Impact and its analysis

Download Free Sample PDF

444 Alaska Avenue

Suite #BAA205 Torrance, CA 90503 USA

+1 424 360 2221

24/7 Customer Support

Download Free Sample PDF